|
Document Type |
: |
Thesis |
|
Document Title |
: |
Utilizing Grammatical Analogy in Grammatical Gatherings And Dictates “AL-Majales” and “Al-Amaali Al- Nahweyyah”; An Analytical And Critical Study توظيف القياس في المجالس والأمالي النَّحويَّة " دراسة تحليليَّة نقديَّة " |
|
Subject |
: |
Utilizing Grammatical Analogy in Grammatical Gatherings And Dictates “AL-Majales” and “Al-Amaali Al- Nahweyyah”; An Analytical And Critical Study |
|
Document Language |
: |
Arabic |
|
Abstract |
: |
The concept of analogy is related to syntactic fundamentals to the extent that it may be understood that its uses in syntactic writings do not exceed such concept. This was the reason for the basic question of the present study: Did analogy come in such books only as a fundamental of syntactic ones? What is the evidence? How are its shapes considered? In order to answer this question, I looked in wirings of dictations and forums as lack of studies motivated me to tackle them and extract its essence as well as its unique merit; the emergence of syntactic analogy in its applied academic style and the variance of grammatical thought production clearly as it include the comparative, argumentative, or educational. Such merits put forward the other question of the study: Have the different syntactic thought production methods effects in employing analogy? How can this effect be controlled? What is its entity?
As the basic objective of this study is to present a general view about analogy employment in syntactic dictated writings not only for limitation, the researcher decided that five books were enough to achieve such objective; "Majalis Alolamaa" for Al-Zajaji, "Amali Alsohili" for Al-Sohili, "Majalis Thaalab" for Thalaab, "Amali Ibn Alshajari" for Ibn Al-Shajari, and "Amali Ibn Alhajib" for Ibn Alhajib. The researcher used the inductive analytical critical approach. The researcher induced the analogy topics in the study publications and classified them according to its two types: as evidence of syntactic opinion or as a source of syntactic judgments recording the mechanisms of manipulating analogy in order to clarify, at last, the relation between syntactic thought production methods with analogy manipulation in the study books. Consequently, the study came in three chapter preceded by an introduction included three sections and a concluding of the study results. The results include: analogy is manipulated as evidence of syntactic opinions as well as a source of syntactic judgments; the type of manipulation as a mono-source is the type in which analogy may be a fundamental of syntactic fundamentals. However, manipulating analogy as a joint source takes it away from syntactic fundamentals frame as its role shall be supportive in most cases. So, the generalization of the concept related to analogy is clearly become false. The study concluded that analogy in most types is not more than an ideal manipulation of the audible martial and the relation between syntactic thought production methods with analogy manipulation is an integral one. The researcher recommended the necessity to intensify studies about syntactic forums and dictation to extract their essences. |
|
Supervisor |
: |
Dr.Salwa Arab |
|
Thesis Type |
: |
Doctorate Thesis |
|
Publishing Year |
: |
1435 AH
2014 AD |
|
Number Of Pages |
: |
265 |
|
Added Date |
: |
Friday, July 26, 2019 |
|
Researchers
| فوزية بداح العتيبي | Al-otabi, Fauzeya Badah | Researcher | Doctorate | |
|